The Geometric Tragedy of the 101-Slide Strategy Deck
The projector hums with a low, electronic groan that feels like it is vibrating in my molars. We are currently on slide 81. The title, rendered in a sans-serif font that screams ‘expensive but soulless,’ reads: ‘Vertical Alignment of Horizontal Value Streams.’ I am sitting in the back of the room, the same spot I always occupy during these quarterly summits, watching the light flicker across the faces of 11 executives who have surrendered their morning to the altar of the 101-slide PowerPoint deck. The air in the conference room is stale, smelling faintly of over-extracted coffee and the 1 singular brand of carpet cleaner that seems to be used in every corporate office from here to the year 2031. My hands are still slightly cramped from this morning’s domestic failure. I attempted to fold a fitted sheet for 21 minutes, a task that I am convinced is a litmus test for a level of sanity I do not possess. Every time I thought I had the corners aligned, the fabric would slip, collapsing into a lump of chaotic cotton that looked more like a discarded parachute than bedding.
I look back up at slide 81. The strategy document is the corporate version of that fitted sheet. It is a 101-page attempt to impose right angles on a reality that is fundamentally elastic, messy, and prone to snapping back in your face. We spent 31 days crafting this deck. We had meetings about the meetings. We debated the specific shade of navy blue for the header bars. We articulated 11 ‘core synergistic imperatives’ that were supposed to redefine how we operate. And yet, as I look around the room, I see 1 individual staring at their reflection, 11 people checking their phones, and 1 manager who appears to have mastered the art of sleeping with their eyes open. The tragedy isn’t that the strategy is bad; the tragedy is that it is performative. We are not planning for the future; we are performing the act of ‘Leadership’ for an audience of ourselves.
The Dirt: Plans Meeting Reality
As a prison education coordinator, my daily reality is usually stripped of this kind of fluff. My name is Sage R., and I spend my time in a facility where the distance between a plan and its execution is often measured in the 1 second it takes for a situation to turn volatile. In the prison library, we don’t have the luxury of 101 slides. We have a list of books, a schedule of 11 classes, and 1 goal: don’t let the light in someone’s eyes go out. When I am invited to these ‘strategic visioning’ sessions at the main office, the contrast is enough to give me whiplash. The executives speak in a language of ‘optimization’ and ‘pivoting,’ while back at the facility, the 41 students in my GED program are just trying to figure out how to pass a math test with a calculator that is missing the number 1 key.
The Gap: Deck vs. Dirt (Conceptual Data)
There is a profound organizational cynicism that grows in the gap between the deck and the dirt. When the team sees slide 81-this complex matrix of imperatives-they don’t see a roadmap. They see a barrier. They see evidence that the people at the top have forgotten what it’s like to actually do the work. Last week, I tried to implement one of the ‘strategic pivots’ from the 1st quarter. It involved a 31-page reporting requirement for every student interaction. By the 11th hour of the work week, my staff hadn’t spent a single minute actually teaching; they were too busy documenting the fact that they weren’t teaching. We had achieved ‘Vertical Alignment’ at the cost of our actual mission. It was a perfect, folded sheet in a room where everyone was sleeping on the floor.
The Zoo Guide Philosophy
This is why I find the philosophy of a Zoo Guide so refreshing compared to our corporate monstrosities. When you enter a zoo, you don’t want a 101-page thesis on the socio-economic impacts of animal conservation in the 21st century. You want to know where the lions are. You want to know if the 11:01 feeding is still happening. You want a clear, actionable plan that directly impacts your immediate reality.
– Sage R., Coordinator
A guide is humble; it admits that the person using it is the one doing the walking. A strategy deck, by contrast, is arrogant. It assumes that if the map is detailed enough, the territory will simply follow orders. But the territory never does. The territory is made of people, and people are 101 times more complicated than a PowerPoint animation.
The Vanity Project
I remember a specific instance during my 1st year as a coordinator. I had designed a 21-step curriculum for a creative writing workshop. I was so proud of the structure. I had 11 different modules on character development and 1 singular module on the ‘metaphysics of narrative.’
On the first day, a student named Marcus looked at my 31-page syllabus, tossed it into the trash can, and asked if we could just talk about how to write a letter to his daughter that would make her want to visit him. In that 1 moment, my ‘strategy’ was revealed as the vanity project it was. Marcus didn’t need a syllabus; he needed a bridge. The corporate deck is rarely a bridge. It is more often a monument to the person who built it.
[The map is not the territory but we keep trying to live in the map]
The Illusion of Control
We continue to produce these 101-slide documents because they provide the illusion of control. If we can categorize the ‘market headwinds’ into 11 neat buckets, then we don’t have to feel the wind. If we can project our growth out to the year 2031 using a linear regression model, we can ignore the 11 variables that could blow the whole thing apart tomorrow. It is a psychological security blanket. I see it in the eyes of the senior leader currently presenting. He is clinging to the clicker like it’s a life raft. If he gets to slide 101, he has ‘led.’ If he finishes the presentation, he has ‘strategized.’ The fact that nothing in the actual organization will change as a result is secondary to the successful completion of the ritual.
This is why the performative act of leadership kills trust. When the frontline staff-the people in the 21 different regional offices-receive the ‘2031 Vision’ email with its 101-slide attachment, they don’t feel inspired. They feel managed. They feel like they are being told to follow a guide written by someone who has never been to the zoo. There is a specific kind of silence that follows these presentations. It’s not the silence of contemplation; it’s the silence of 111 people waiting for the 1 person in charge to leave the room so they can go back to doing their jobs the way they’ve always done them-through grit, intuition, and the 11 small workarounds they’ve invented to bypass the official ‘strategy.’
The Choice: Hiding vs. Clarity
Obscures Vision
Creates Clarity
If we really wanted to change things, we would burn the decks. We would replace the 101 slides with 1 single page. We would ask 11 questions that actually matter. We would stop trying to align value streams and start trying to align human intentions. But that is terrifying. A 1-page strategy is dangerous because you can’t hide in it. You can’t obscure a lack of vision with a 51-megabyte file size. You have to be clear. You have to be honest. And you have to admit that you might be wrong.
As the presenter finally clicks through to slide 101-a ‘Thank You’ slide featuring a 1-pixel-too-wide photo of a sunset-I feel a sense of profound exhaustion. I think about the fitted sheet waiting for me at home, still a crumpled pile on the chair. I think about the 11 students waiting for me tomorrow morning, who don’t care about my vertical alignment or my horizontal synergies. They just want to know if I’ve found a way to get the number 1 key fixed on their calculators. And I realize that the only strategy that has ever worked is the one that is small enough to fit in your pocket and clear enough to be remembered when the lights go out. Is it possible that the more we explain our vision, the less of it anyone can actually see?
-
Tagged Finance